<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon 28mm f/1.8G Review &#8211; by Brian Blanco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephotobrigade.com/2012/06/nikon-28mm-f1-8g-review-by-brian-blanco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephotobrigade.com/2012/06/nikon-28mm-f1-8g-review-by-brian-blanco/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Owners of both Nikon 24mm 1.4G and 35mm 1.4G</title>
		<link>http://thephotobrigade.com/2012/06/nikon-28mm-f1-8g-review-by-brian-blanco/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Owners of both Nikon 24mm 1.4G and 35mm 1.4G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotobrigade.com/?p=7374#comment-931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Originally Posted by GReddyZC76   wahaha.  i was still thinking how come the 28mm f1.8g wasnt metioned.  wahaha.  anyway if ts has no problem with f1.8g then can consider. but note its an ecomonical lens made in china, with light, and feel like cheap-plastical. feel.  else, retain ur 35mm and get the 24mm.    I agree with the quality of built.  Can take a look here : http://thephotobrigade.com/2012/06/n...-brian-blanco/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by GReddyZC76   wahaha.  i was still thinking how come the 28mm f1.8g wasnt metioned.  wahaha.  anyway if ts has no problem with f1.8g then can consider. but note its an ecomonical lens made in china, with light, and feel like cheap-plastical. feel.  else, retain ur 35mm and get the 24mm.    I agree with the quality of built.  Can take a look here : <a href="http://thephotobrigade.com/2012/06/n" rel="nofollow">http://thephotobrigade.com/2012/06/n</a>&#8230;-brian-blanco/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
